If it's not an emergency, please stay away from A&E. Get the right care for you

Workforce indicators

Indicator 2: Relative likelihood of staff being appointed from shortlisting across all posts

  • White: 19.78%
  • BAME: 15.90%
  • EUK: 18.01%
  • Relative likelihood of White staff being appointed form shortlisting compared to BME staff: 1.24

Indicator 3: Relative likelihood of staff entering the formal disciplinary process as measured by entry into a formal disciplinary investigation

  • White: 0.13%
  • BAME: 0.47%
  • EUK: 0.44%
  • relative likelihood of BME staff entering the formal disciplinary process compared to White staff: 3.73

Indicator 4: Relative likelihood of staff accessing non-mandatory training and CPD

  • White: 8.14%
  • BAME: 9.68%
  • EUK: 5.93%
  • Relative likelihood of White staff accessing non-mandatory training and CPD compared to BME staff: 0.84

Indicator 9: Percentage difference between the organisations board membership and its overall workforce

Board representation indicator
  White BME EUK
Total Board members 10 6 0
Of which: Voting Board Members 13 3 0
Non-voting Board Members 3 0 0
Total Board members 10 6 0
Of which: Exec Board Members 9 0 0
Non-executive Board Members 7 6 0
Total Board Members by ethnicity 72.7% 27.3% 0.0%
Voting Board Members - % ethnicity 81.3% 18.8% 0.0%
Non-voting Board Member - % by ethnicity 100.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Executive Board Member - % by ethnicity 100.0%    
Non-executive Board Member - by ethnicity 53.8% 46.2% 0.0%
Difference (Total Board – overallworkforce) 45.0% -39.7% -5.3%

Help us improve our website. How useful was this page?

Help us improve our website. How useful was this page?
Rating