Workforce indicators
Indicator 2: Relative likelihood of staff being appointed from shortlisting across all posts
- White: 19.78%
- BAME: 15.90%
- EUK: 18.01%
- Relative likelihood of White staff being appointed form shortlisting compared to BME staff: 1.24
Indicator 3: Relative likelihood of staff entering the formal disciplinary process as measured by entry into a formal disciplinary investigation
- White: 0.13%
- BAME: 0.47%
- EUK: 0.44%
- relative likelihood of BME staff entering the formal disciplinary process compared to White staff: 3.73
Indicator 4: Relative likelihood of staff accessing non-mandatory training and CPD
- White: 8.14%
- BAME: 9.68%
- EUK: 5.93%
- Relative likelihood of White staff accessing non-mandatory training and CPD compared to BME staff: 0.84
Indicator 9: Percentage difference between the organisations board membership and its overall workforce
| White | BME | EUK | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total Board members | 10 | 6 | 0 |
| Of which: Voting Board Members | 13 | 3 | 0 |
| Non-voting Board Members | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Total Board members | 10 | 6 | 0 |
| Of which: Exec Board Members | 9 | 0 | 0 |
| Non-executive Board Members | 7 | 6 | 0 |
| Total Board Members by ethnicity | 72.7% | 27.3% | 0.0% |
| Voting Board Members - % ethnicity | 81.3% | 18.8% | 0.0% |
| Non-voting Board Member - % by ethnicity | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Executive Board Member - % by ethnicity | 100.0% | ||
| Non-executive Board Member - by ethnicity | 53.8% | 46.2% | 0.0% |
| Difference (Total Board – overallworkforce) | 45.0% | -39.7% | -5.3% |